Conditions And Guidelines for Developing Ethical Leadership of School Administrators in The Mae Chan District Education Development Network Schools Under the Office of The Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area 3
Abstract:
This study aimed to 1) study and compare the ethical leadership of school administrators within the educational development network of Mae Chan District under the Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area Office 3, and 2) explore guidelines for the development of ethical leadership among these administrators. The sample group consisted of 201 teachers, while the key informants included five individuals: executives from the Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area Office and school administrators. Research tools comprised questionnaires and interviews. Data were analyzed using basic statistical methods including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, along with qualitative content analysis. The findings revealed that: 1) The overall ethical leadership of school administrators was at the highest level. Among the dimensions, the highest mean score was for respectability, followed by honesty, responsibility, and trustworthiness, respectively, while fairness had the lowest mean score. 2) The comparison of ethical leadership by educational qualification showed significant differences overall, particularly in the dimension of trustworthiness. Similarly, differences were observed in the dimension of trustworthiness when comparing administrators based on work experience. 3) The development guidelines for ethical leadership suggested that administrators should uphold principles of fairness, transparency, and rational decision -making while fostering participation from all stakeholders. They should lead with integrity, transparency, and accountability, serving as role models in discipline and continuous self-improvement. Furthermore, building trust through open and fair communication, providing equal support to personnel, and respecting individuals without discrimination were essential. Promoting an inclusive and just organizational culture was emphasized as a key factor for sustainable development