Abstract:
The purposes of this study were 1) To study personnel management of secondary schools in Nonthaburi Province under the Nonthaburi Secondary Educational Service Area Office 2) To compare personnel management of secondary schools in Nonthaburi. 3) To study guidelines to develop personnel management of secondary schools in Nonthaburi Province under the Nonthaburi Secondary Educational Service Area Office. The sample group included administrators and teachers in total of 331 people calculated the sample size from Taro Yamane's formula by using a simple random Stratified sampling. The used tool was a questionnaire. The statistics used in data analysis include frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test statistic, and F test statistic.
The research results found that
1. The overall personnel management in educational institutions under the Nonthaburi Secondary Educational Service Area Office is at a high level. When considering each aspect, the aspect with the highest average score is termination, followed by recruitment, personnel development, and the aspect with the lowest average score is personnel retention.
2. The administration of personnel in educational institutions under the Nonthaburi Secondary Educational Service Area Office, categorized by gender, age, educational level, current position, and work experience, was found to have no significant differences.
3. The approach to developing personnel management in secondary schools in Nonthaburi province should involve school administrators creating a staffing plan that aligns with the institution's vision, mission, and goals. This plan should define clear qualifications for staff, such as education, experience, and special skills. Additionally, it is important to assess the need for professional skill and knowledge development among staff, promoting continuous learning and adaptability. Building good relationships between teachers, administrators, and staff through team-building activities is essential. Support should be provided to staff with potential to advance in their careers, while transparent criteria for performance evaluation should be established, with clear steps and conditions to ensure mutual understanding.