Abstract:
The purpose of this research was to follow up the knowledge and skills of the trainees using program CATIA V5 course to apply in their daily work and to compare the knowledge and skills of the trainees using program CATIA V5 separated by experience. The sample group of this research was obtained a simple random sampling number of 144 people who received training using CATIA V5 during the year 2010-2011 from a total of 230 people. The instruments used in the research were tests and assessments which covered all the commands of the story Sketcher, Part Design, Assembly Design, Drafting, and Generative Shape Design. The statistics used in data analysis were percentage, mean, standard deviation and one-way analysis of variance.
The results of this research were as follows.
1. The knowledge and skills of the trainees using program CATIA V5 course to apply in their daily work using Sketcher: The average knowledge (Selection of commands) had an average overall very good. However, when considering each item of the test showed 3 items are in very good and 3 items in the middle level. As for time (skill) the results were around average. However, when considering all of the tests showed 2 items were at high and 4 items at the middle level. The accuracy (Skill) was at a high level overall, however, when considering each item of the test found that every item was at a high level. For Part Design, the average knowledge (Selection of commands) was at a high average overall. However, when considering all of the tests showed that 3 items were at high and 3 items were at the middle level. The time (skill) was average overall. However, when considering all of the tests, we find 2 items at the high level and 4 items in the middle level. The accuracy (skill) was in the high level overall. However, when considering each item of the test showed that 3 items were in the high level and 3 items were in the middle level. For Assembly Design, the average was high in every aspect. Drafting average knowledge (Selection of commands) was in the high level, the time (skill) was in the middle level and accuracy (skill) was in the high level. Generative Shape Design Average rating is average in every aspect.
2. Comparing the knowledge and skills of the trainees using program CATIA V5 in applying to their daily work found that, Experience of work does not cause a difference in applying knowledge and skills in practice