Abstract:
The objectives of this research were 1) to study the academic administration of school administrators under the Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3, 2) to study the quality of learners in schools under the Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3, and 3) to study academic administration of School administrators affecting learner collect data from questionnaires The sample group was school administrators Academic teachers, teachers in schools under the Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3 were employed by quantitative research methods using questionnaires. The results showed that: 1.Academic administration of school administrators under the Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3, the overall average was at a high level. Sorted from highest to lowest average is the development of quality assurance systems within educational institutions and educational standards, followed by educational supervision. Development of learning process curriculum development in educational institutions Measurement and Evaluation In terms of development, there is a source of learning. and research to improve the quality of education in educational institutions 2. Quality of learners in school Under the Office of Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area, Area 3, the overall and individual averages were at a high level. Ranking from highest to lowest averages were work skills, followed by knowledge seeking skills, morality, ethics and desirable values, thinking skills, learning achievement. and good physical and mental health. 3. The academic administration of school administrators that affected learner quality in schools under the Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3 was learning process development. Research to improve the quality of education in educational institutions in terms of development, there is a source of learning. Educational Supervision and the development of quality assurance systems within educational institutions and educational standards. with statistical significance at the .01 level with a predictive coefficient or predictive power of 66.60 %